important things you learned in the course

i need a discussion question 500 words with references and 200 word response i need it exactly like the samples i sent you on the last one .both must have intext citation for references

/by

answer question below based on the providing reading

WOMEN FOUNDERS

*Name of woman founder and chapter number:

*List and discuss five important facts about the woman founder:

1.

2.

3.

4.




5.

*What are the main contributions this woman founder made to the field of sociology?

/by

bul3130 case study

The assignment is to write a three page pager on the information that is provided in the picture that I have posted .THe paper needed to be in APA format with references included .

/by

please read the requirement carefully

There aren’t “right” answers to the responses (except on the last one), there needs to be “supported” answers.The key to this exam is two fold:

  • To allow the student to express his or her own approach in navigating the complex field of “”world religions” and his or her own place in it.
  • To invite and allow the student to demonstrate command of the key ideas across religious traditions concerning the questions posted.

The essay submissions will be evaluated according to these requirements.

Essay 1: (250-400 words; 10 points)

  • Part 1: In your opinion, what is the most influential world religion or world religious figure?Why?
  • Part 2: What do you see as the “religion of the future”? Is there one religion (or none) that you think is going to take hold of your generation as you all matriculate into late adulthood?

* The important part of the response:WHY?WHY do you think what you think?What experiences have you had that lead you to think this way?What have you encountered in your life among family, friends, and classmates that drives your thinking on this issue?

Essay 2: (250-400 words; 10 points)

We are going to go all the way back to the beginning of the course (Module 1, Session 4) and thinking about how you (and your beliefs) relate to other religions.

Into which “theological model” (according to Jones) would you place yourself?Essentially, how do you see your own belief system (if any) in relation to other systems?How do you and your own religious beliefs confront/interact with/incorporate other religious teachings?

Here is a brief outline of the ideas.Be sure to show mastery of the concepts while presenting your own view.

https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-…

Scan the reading and be sure to grasp the key ideas of the different theological models on how to view other religions. Know the differences between the following approaches:

  • Exclusivism
    • Weak
    • Strong
  • Inclusivism
    • In-Spite Of
    • By-Means Of
  • Pluralism
  • Parallelism

Essay 3: (300-400 words; 15 points)

Certainly, all Five Pillars of the Islamic faith are important. However, you have been selected to introduce the basics of Islam to a class of people with limited patience and attention spans. You have time to explain only the one “Pillar” that you feel best shows the true meaning of Islam. Which do you chose? Why?

  • Explain the “pillar” in detail and provide support for why it is the one chosen.
  • WHY is this “pillar” the most important?And show command of the ideas of Islam in the response.

Essay 4: Final Semester Long Essay (35 points):

Your friend is writing a blog post on suffering and how religions deal with it.She doesn’t know where to start.She is on the verge of abandoning religion all together (even coming from a fairly non-religious family) because she cannot find a good explanation for suffering in the world.

  • You job is to explain three approaches to suffering (or why there is evil in the world) according to different religions in the world.
  • You then try to convince her to embrace one of the proposed options (even if you are not a member of that religion).
  • So, your response will:
  • Clearly present three approaches for explaining suffering/unhappiness/evil in the world (8 points for each approach)
  • An argument for one of these approaches (or a 4th approach) as the best accounting for suffering.This may require some more background into the religious tradition.
    • The argument should be compassionate, clear, and convincing…
    • The convincing nature of this argument (and demonstration of command of the ideas) is worth 10 points.
/by

philosophical essay outline

Week 4 – Philosophical Essay Outline

DUE: Sep 1, 2019 11:55 PM

Grade Details

Grade

N/A

Gradebook Comments

None

Assignment Details

Open Date

Aug 5, 2019 12:05 AM

Graded?

Yes

Points Possible

100.0

Resubmissions Allowed?

No

Attachments checked for originality?

Yes

Top of Form

Assignment Instructions

Goal: Students will create a detailed outline for the week 7 Philosophical Essay.

Course Objectives: 2, 3, & 4

Details:

You will pick one of the following topics only to do your paper on:

  • According to Socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters? Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted? Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
  • Consider the following philosophical puzzle: “If a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?” (1) How is this philosophical puzzle an epistemological problem? And (2) how would John Locke answer it?
  • Evaluate the movie, The Matrix, in terms of the philosophical issues raised with (1) skepticism and (2) the mind-body problem. Explain how the movie raises questions similar to those found in Plato’s and Descartes’ philosophy. Do not give a plot summary of the movie – focus on the philosophical issues raised in the movie as they relate to Plato and Descartes.
  • Socrates asks Euthyphro, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (1) How does this question relate to the Divine Command Theory of morality? (2) What are the philosophical implications associated with each option here?
  • Explain (1) the process by which Descartes uses skepticism to refute skepticism, and (2) what first principle does this lead him to? (3) Explain why this project was important for Descartes to accomplish.

What you are submitting now is your outline (not the full assignment) for your week 7 Philosophical Essay (not the actual paper – that is due in week 7). There is a Word file marked Outline Template for your use. Please download it and use it for this assignment.

In two to three full pages you need to include the following:

I. Your rough draft introduction with a clear thesis. How to Write a Thesis Statement

The following is an example (do not copy/paste and use) of a thesis statement/beginning introduction:

Thesis Statement:

In this essay I evaluate the philosophical puzzle: “If a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one around to hear it, does it make a sound?” In my evaluation I explain that this question raises the epistemological problem of how a subjective experience, such as sound, relates to what can be known of reality. I demonstrate that this question is a puzzle because it exposes the limits of what we can claim to know based on sensory experience. Lastly, I will explain how the empiricist, John Locke, would evaluate and answer the puzzle.

II-IV. A list of three or more body paragraphs with transitioning sentences. This is just an outline of three or more body paragraphs. You are not writing the entire paragraph here. Just the outline.

For example:

I. Discuss morality:

  1. Explain morality.
  2. Then a sentence that transitions to your next paragraph such as: The next area for discussion is skepticism.

Your next paragraph outline like above and so forth.

V. Your rough draft of a conclusion

VI. Your Works Cited of at least three reliable/scholarly resources

Remember:

  • Purpose: Clearly articulated thesis statement of appropriate scope that (1) tells the reader how you will interpret the significance of the question, and (2) tells the reader what you intend to accomplish in your essay. Body paragraphs with transitioning sentences. Conclusion. Works Cited in MLA formatting.
  • Support: List of three or more reliable/scholarly resources.
  • Syntax, Style, Grammar, and Formatting: The writing contains sentences that are always complete and grammatically correct, and free of confusion and ambiguity. The essay follows MLA formatting and adheres to the additional guidelines detailed in the syllabus.
  • Looking Ahead: The 4 – 5 full page (not to exceed 6 pages) Philosophical Essay you will be writing due Week 7 is designed to be a thoughtful, reflective work. It will be your premier writing assignment focused on the integration and assessment relating to the course concepts. It is 4 – 5 full pages of text. This does not include a cover page or a Works Cited page.

Resources:

Bottom of Form

I’ll be adding addational information in the drop box

/by

a powerpoint presentation on these topics cataract and glaucoma

Attached is a document for a PowerPoint project.

Create a power point on the following

CATARACT AND GLAUCOMA

  • What is it/ definition
  • Pathophysiology
  • Risk factors if any
  • Cause
  • Nursing Diagnosis
  • Diagnostic test
  • Clinical manifestation
  • Treatment
  • Health promotion and teaching

There several kinds of glaucoma. You can list all but the paper will focus on the 2 most common: open-angle and acute angle closure.

Please include intext citations and references in APA format. Feel free to throw in pictures.

Kind regards,

/by

student discipline and due process 2

Review the school board policy and student handbook of your local public school site(Rosenwald Elementary) (Pointe Coupee Parish )or district for information regarding their policies on short- and long-term suspensions of students. You may also obtain this information by interviewing an administrator at your chosen site.

Based on the information that you gather, write a 500-750-word essay summarizing:

  • The due process requirements prior to a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student at your local site or district.
  • Are the due process procedures for a short-term and a long-term suspension of a student the same or different?
  • Are these requirements consistent with Goss v. Lopez? Support your position with examples from case law, the U.S. Constitution, or other readings.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

/by

lc self assessment 1

Please complete the assessment below.

Please include the assessment as the first page of the submision

APA

Step 1—Complete the assessment and write a short summary of the results.

Step 2—Reflect on what the results reveal about your leadership communication behaviors. Respond to the following questions:

  • What have you learned from completing this exercise?
  • How has your self-understanding increased?
  • What does this assessment reveal about your potential strengths and weaknesses as a leader (or follower)?
  • Based on this assessment, how can you improve your effectiveness as a leader or follower?

Step 3—Outline specific action steps you will take to become a more effective leader or follower based on your analysis in Step 2.

/by

application security and research about os according to the following instructions

research papers on OS , with no plagiarism follow the instruction in below documents

/by

short literature review 1

For this literature review, it is important to show their knowledge about the research topic.

This literature review is different from an annotated bibliography, which is a listing of articles with descriptions. A critical review is not a string of summaries, it is a synthesized review. In other words, students do not simply write a short review of each research study, but tie the research studies together into a “story” or “conversation.”

This process requires some insight and interpretation, not evaluation. Keep in mind that personal opinions are not included in a literature review.

Report what is relevant to your study and ignore what is not. This means you need to read the abstract, the introduction and conclusion of your articles. And, for long articles, focus on the parts that relate to your topic.

**At the end of the literature review, you will also need to write a two-paragraph summary of what you have learned about the topic from the three articles. This includes critique and reflection about the “story,” not the individual articles.**

Avoid long quotes in your review, and paraphrase whenever possible.

Maximum quotes = 2 short quotes (less than 40 words each).

Correct APA formatting is also required – double-spaced, 12 pt Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins all around, APA in-text citations and a reference page. Run spelling and grammar checks and double-check your APA formatting. Be sure to CITE your sources throughout the review.

This review must be a minimum of 1,500 words, including a title page, abstract, and reference page. APA formatted is required!

Grading Rubric

Short Literature Reviews will be graded according to the following criteria:

  1. Content and Development (Total points: 60)
  2. Paper adequately synthesizes the key ideas and conclusions from the three articles and puts them in conversation with one another: 60 Points
  3. Mechanics and Style (Total points: 40)
  4. APA rules of spelling, grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed: 30 Points
  5. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise, and the tone is appropriate to the content and assignment: 10 Points

100 points total

/by