Topic: CLABSI (Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection)

INSTRUCTION:

Find an article that emphasize on Nursing care and management related to CLABSI (Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection)

  • Summarize the article
  • Use APA guidelines
  • No more than five pages; NOT including cover page and reference page
  • Double spaced
  • USE ARTICLES ONLY FROM NURSING JOURNALS, NO OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS
  • PROVIDE “URL” for article on reference page.
  • Article types should emphasize NURSING CARE AND MANAGEMENT!

What approach should be used to measure a capital asset impairment loss that results from physical damage to the capital asset?

The purpose of this assignment is to help you understand the types of patient consent and what role they play in the health care industry. It is important also to understand the legal issues and laws that regulate third-party payers.

Review the Extra Help and Example document to find helpful tips and an example format to complete this assignment.

Complete the chart below:

Cite 2 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references to support your paper.

Format your references according to APA guidelines.

Write initial discussion post:

A number of states are looking to institute caps on non-economic damages for doctors in medical liability lawsuits in order to reduce insurance premiums. Based on what you’ve learned in this module (as well as the links below), do you think that this is a good idea?

Please explain in two or more paragraphs. As required for all discussion questions, your response must be referenced and supported.

Respond to Post 1:

  • Placing caps (tort reform, personal-injury law) on non-economic damages (suffering, loss of limb, pain, loss of companionship) for doctors in medical liability lawsuits in order to reduce medical coverage insurance premiums is not accurate to state, as the cost of healthcare is not driven by litigation (Figman, n.d.). Medical liability makes up 2-2.5 percent of total health care spending (NPR, 2017). Caps are often associated with “high-stakes” malpractice cases, thus have minimal effect (Cowdin, 2018). Healthcare costs are a result of medical error and economics of the health care market (Figman, n.d.). A very small percentage of health care cost is associated with malpractice suites. Tort reform can also include limits to the Statute of Limitations. All this leads to additional harm to patients and greater protections for doctors (Figman, n.d.). The court system acts as a general deterrent for physicians, attorneys assist with separating valid malpractice claims from illegitimate ones, and liability insurance protects physicians from bankruptcy (Cowdin, 2018). This leads to the practice of “defensive medicine”, which is when tests and procedures are ordered out of fear of being sued. The patient then pays the additional costs for these tests and procedures. In addition, any increases to malpractice insurance premiums are passed on to the patient (Cowdin, 2018).H.R. 1215, Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017 passed in the house of representatives and was threatening to place federal standards on tort law, an area the states traditional determined the rules for (NPR, 2017). Proponents of the bill were stating health care cost savings through the reduction of medical liability insurance premiums costs, thus perhaps less “defensive medicine.” However, H.R. 1215 was stating a $250,000 cap in cases for example of a loss of a limb (115th Congress, 2017). Currently, there are 35 states with caps on non-economic damages malpractice cases.Respectfully,
    Theresa115th Congress (2017).
  • House of Representatives 1215-Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1215/textCowdin, J. & Lindley, T. (2018).
  • A New Medical Malpractice Tort System: It’s Time to Prioritize the Patient. Brigham Young University Prelaw Review, 32(24), 161-177. Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1282&context=byuplrFigman, A. (n.d.).
  • The Fallacies of Medial Malpractice “Tort Reform”. Cardozo Law, Yeshiva University. Retrieved from https://cardozo.yu.edu/sites/default/files/Figman.FallaciesOfMedMalTortReform.pdf Andrews, M. (2017).
  • This GOP Health Bill Proposes New Limits To Medical Malpractice Awards. Kaiser Health News via National Public Radio. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/06/28/534465478/this-gop-health-bill-proposes-new-limits-to-medical-malpractice-awards

Respond to post 2:

  • Medical Malpractice falls in to three categories. Those categories encompass several different categories of error.

    • Failure to Diagnose, which is failure to diagnose or misdiagnosis of a medical illness.
    • Delayed Diagnosis, which is a misdiagnosis changed to a correct diagnosis
    • Failure to Treat, which is correctly diagnosis, but failing to treat (Ryskamp, 2019).

    Texas malpractice damages are broken down into different categories:

    • Economic damages, which is a repayment for medical bills and lost wages for missed work.
    • Non-economic damages, which is payment for pain and suffering
    • Punitive damages, which punish the provider

    There is a $250,000 cap on doctors and healthcare providers and a $250,000 cap on each hospital. The cap for all non-economic damages is $500,000 (Ryskamp, D 2019).Yes, I believe that it is a good idea to have caps on non-economic damages. Texas voters approved Proposition 12 in 2003, which allowed caps to be placed on damages. To be considered a malpractice claim, they have to be considered negligence. When a doctor does not follow the standard of care, they are considered negligent. This is where quality measures become beneficial. Providers who practice the standards of care have patients that are more likely to have positive outcomes. There has been found to be a relationship between an increase in hospital performance and a decrease in malpractice claims (Becker, 2015). Uncapped damages increase malpractice costs for all providers, which that cost is then placed on the consumer. References:

  • Beckers (2015). Quality improvement efforts reduce malpractice claims, researcher finds. Retrieved September 12, 2014 from: beckershospitalreview.com
  • Ryskamp, D (2019). Texas Medical Malpractice Laws & Statutory Rules. Retrieved Septemper 12, 2019 from alllow.com

  • Compare and contrast treatment options for special populations identified in our text (i.e., early starters, juvenile gangs, or juvenile sex offenders) and advocate for, or against, shifting juveniles in this category to treatment options outside normal juvenile delinquency programs.
  • You should identify a specific category identified as being part of special populations and a treatment option as part of the discussion. What are the benefits to this program in addressing the special population? Are there drawbacks, if so what are they? How are outcomes identified and measured?

Use at least two credible sources to support your claims. Total word count should be minimum of 800 words.

HERE IS THE ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW. STEP 4 IS WHERE I NEED TO CREATE A POWER POINT.

i attached the paper and some notes that were made. please FIX THE NOTES AND ALSO ADD, FIX, ANY GRAMMAR, MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE ESSAY ITSELF.

MAKE SURE EVERYTHING IS APA GUIDELINES THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT.

Please add extra sentences in my essay for it to align better with the rubric guidelines.

Critical Assignment Overview

You are developing a comprehensive Organizational Leadership Innovation Plan. Identify and select a specific organization that you are currently employed or affiliated with (if not currently employed can select a previous employer or affiliation.) TIP: YOU MUST BE INTIMITALY FAMILIAR WITH THIS ORGANIZATION AND IT MUST BE REAL, SELECTING YOUR EMPLOYER IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED. This will become your “chosen” organization and the context for your ENTIRE project. -You cannot change organizations mid-course, choose wisely.

Your plan will thoroughly examine three facets:

(1) An overview of your chosen organization, and personal leadership examination, including examination of conflict styles.

(2) Assessment and Plan for leveraging the organization’s human capital, diversity and inclusion.

(3) Strategic Assessment, Change plan, and Ethical Evaluation: assessing the organization’s strategy, identifying and recommending an innovative change (to address a gap, need, or issue) that currently exists in your organization in order to make the organization more strategic and sustainable.

You will be tasked with utilizing the skill sets you have acquired from the courses you have completed in this program as well as the subsequent learning that comes from synthesizing the concepts and experience applying the concepts in real-life. Theories covered in the following courses should be applied in the analysis:

Foundations of Organizational Leadership

Conflict Resolution and Negotiations

Organizational Communication

Leadership Across Cultures

Leading Organizational Change

Practical Financial Management

Managing Human Capital

Legal, Ethical, and Public Policy Issues

Strategic Management

Assignment Requirements:

Write a plan that includes each of the following components:

  1. My Organization & Personal Leadership Examination
  1. Organization Overview: Identify and select a specific organization that you are currently employed or affiliated with (if not currently employed can select a previous employer or affiliation). Include description of the industry, history or founding background. Provide an overview of the organization’s financial health. Examine what is this organization’s standing within their industry (are they a leader, are they a new-comer, an underdog).
  2. Personal Leadership Philosophy: Articulate what is your personal leadership philosophy- identify the top two leadership theories that most resonate with you and that you strive to exemplify. Discuss how it’s an appropriate match for your organizational role you are in. Discuss if there’s any challenges in applying this style at this organization and/or in your role, are there any discrepancies or modifications that you have to make in order to be effective in this style within your workplace culture.
  3. Future Leadership Vision: Discuss at least two potential components/facets of leadership that you would like to focus on further developing in order to be better prepared for your future leadership aspirations. Examine how your personal values, beliefs, and faith shape your motivations for your leadership aspirations.
  4. Personal Conflict Style: Identify which conflict style you strive to apply to most situations. Examine if this style is appropriate within your organization given the organizational culture. Evaluate how effectively you perceive yourself to currently exemplify this style. What are your current strengths in exemplifying this style? What are current opportunities for improvement?

II. Leveraging Human Capital & Diversity at the Organization

  1. Human Capital Assessment: Assess the effectiveness of your organization’s Human Capital strategy. What are some strengths of the organization’s human capital? How does the organization’s Human Capital strategy compare with the competition? What are at least 3 recommendations for enhancing human capital relations within your organization.
  2. Assess the level of diversity and inclusion current in your organization. Identify one diversity & inclusion initiative that you would propose to strengthen the organization. Explain why it is needed and what would be the benefits to the organization and to Human Capital.
  3. Detail a change plan to implement this diversity initiative. Identify a specific change theory model, discuss why this model was selected over others. Detail specifically how you would apply each step of the model to effectively implement your change initiative.

III. Strategic Assessment & Change Plan

  1. Strategic Assessment: Assess your organization’s capabilities to execute its strategy by applying the 4 step assessment model identified in the Donlon and Walmer Balanced Scorecard Report. This includes (1) defining the organization’s capabilities, (2) analysis of strategic capability gaps, (3) prioritization and identification of innovative change actions to close identified gaps, (4) establish governance & renewal (identification of resources and monitoring)
  2. Change Plan: Identify a specific change model (Kotter is recommended) and detail how you will apply and implement each step of the change model in order to effectively implement the top priority innovative change needed (as identified in the above requirement A step 3) to close the competitive gap.
  3. Ethical Considerations and Implications: Examine what are the ethical factors, implications, and or repercussions that can result from this strategy and change plan. How does your personal world view, (including personal values, beliefs, and faith) shape your strategic examination of the change and the implementation?

IV. Stakeholder Presentation

Using Microsoft Powerpoint you will provide a 5-7 minute narrated “stakeholder” presentation. In which you communicate the key importance of the three requirements of the assignment: (I) Articulate your personal leadership style; (2) Summarize your recommendation for a key change initiative that allows the organization to leverage human capital and diversity; (3) Encapsulate the strategic change necessary and change plan in order to improve your organization’s competitive advantage. NOTE: Be sure to narrate the slides (MS PPT narration is recommended if you are going to use something else check with your professor.) Be sure to use the MS PPT speakernotes feature to script each slide.

Paper portion of the assignment must be in comprehensive essay format. Paper must adhere to academic writing APA requirements. Be sure to consistently support your analysis and assertions. Don’t forget the title page and reference list.

*****This is the critical assignment for this course and must be passed at an acceptable rate in order to pass the course*****

Critical Assignment Rubric

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Exemplary

Accomplished

Developing

Beginning

Dimension 1: Description of Organizational Background.
CLO – 2.1. 2.2
SLO – 1.1-1.4, 1.6-1.8, 11.2.

Weight 13.00%

90 to 100 %

The organization background is described in great detail.

75 to 89 %

The organization background is described in detail.

60 to 74 %

The organization background is described in some detail.

0 to 59 %

The organization background is described in little detail.

Dimension 2: Articulation of Personal Leadership Philosophy, Vision & Org Fit

CLO – 2.1, 2.2
SLO – 1.1-1.4, 1.6-1.8, 11.3

Weight 12.00%

90 to 100 %

The student’s personal leadership philosophy, vision, and organizational fit is clearly presented and analyzed in great detail.

75 to 89 %

The student’s personal leadership philosophy, vision, and organizational fit is clearly presented and analyzed in detail.

60 to 74 %

The student’s personal leadership philosophy, vision, and organizational fit is presented and analyzed with some details.

0 to 59 %

The student’s personal leadership philosophy, vision, and organizational fit is not sufficiently presented or analyzed.

Dimension 3: Conflict Style and Organizational Culture needs assessment.
CLO – 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2
SLO – 1.1-1.4, 1.6-1.8, 11.4

Weight 13.00%

90 to 100 %

The Conflict Style(s) and org culture analysis are clearly identified, examined and explained in detail.

75 to 89 %

The Conflict Style(s) and org culture is clearly identified and explained in some detail.

60 to 74 %

The Conflict Style(s) and org culture are minimally identified and explained.

0 to 59 %

The Conflict Style(s) and org culture are unclear and not explained.

Dimension 4: Human Capital Assessment CLO – 3.1, 3.2, 4.1
SLO 11.2, 11.3, 1.1-1.5, 1.8

Weight 12.00%

90 to 100 %

A detailed assessment of the organization’s capabilities to execute strategy is identified and examined. Recommendations are thorough and concrete.

75 to 89 %

An adequate assessment of the organization’s capabilities to execute strategy is identified and recommendations are sufficiently examined.

60 to 74 %

An attempt made to assess the organization’s capabilities to execute strategy. Insufficient or unclear analysis and/or recommendation.

0 to 59 %

An incomplete attempt made to assess the organization’s capabilities to execute strategy. Missing or incomplete recommendations.

Dimension 5: Strategic Assessment of the Organization CLO – 1.1, 1.2, 4.2
SLO -1.1-1.4, 11.1

Weight 13.00%

90 to 100 %

Strategic Assessment by thoroughly applying the 4 step model is clearly identified and every step fully examined.

75 to 89 %

Strategic Assessment by applying the 4-step model is sufficient and most steps sufficiently examined.

60 to 74 %

Strategic Assessment by applying the 4-step model is insufficient and/or steps are missing or insufficiently examined.

0 to 59 %

Strategic Assessment by applying the 4-step model is missing or incomplete. The 4-step model has missing components or misapplied.

Dimension 6: Change Plan and Ethical Considerations
CLO – 4.2
SLO – 1.6, 1.8

Weight 12.00%

90 to 100 %

Specifically identifies and effectively applies Change Model Theory to effectively implement innovative strategic change. Thoroughly examines ethical consideration and implications.

75 to 89 %

Sufficiently identifies and adequately applies Change Model Theory to effectively implement innovative strategic change. Sufficiently examines ethical consideration and implications.

60 to 74 %

Insufficiently identifies and/or inadequately applies Change Model Theory for implementing the innovative strategic change. Insufficiently examines ethical consideration and implications

0 to 59 %

The Change Model not specifically identified or incomplete or missing application. Vague or missing ethical examination.

Dimension 7: Creation of narrated presentation summarizing the components of the plan. CLO – 11.4
SLO – 1.5, 1.7, 1.8.

Weight 13.00%

90 to 100 %

A narrated presentation summarizing the components listed above designed to present to your organizations leadership was completed and submitted with the assignment.

75 to 89 %

A narrated presentation summarizing some of components listed above designed to present to your organizations leadership was completed and submitted with the assignment.

60 to 74 %

A narrated presentation summarizing few of the components listed above designed to present to your organizations leadership was completed and submitted with the assignment.

0 to 59 %

A narrated presentation summarizing the components listed above was not included.

Dimension 8: Utilization of library resources to research the topic. Use of APA format.
CLO – 4.2

SLO – 1.1-1.4, 1.6-1.8

Weight 12.00%

90 to 100 %

Several library resources were included to research the topic. APA format was flawless.

75 to 89 %

Few library resources may have been included to research the topic. APA format had few errors.

60 to 74 %

Library resources may have been included to research the topic. APA format included several errors.

0 to 59 %

Library resources were not included to research the topic. APA format was not used.

I had someone do this for me however they didn’t read all the instructions and complete this assignment properly. I will send what they did and the comment my professor left

My assignment is a two-part. I need a paper and power point slide presentation.

PAPER Instructions:

Students will write from the view of the country they are assigned to– India. As if I work for a high ranking officer in the Indian Army. Example, the India student would look at the issue from the Tokyo point of view might react. student will propose USINDOPACOM actions to further US interests related to the regional challenge and issue. The list of issues is not exhaustive and students may propose other areas of concern and issues such as current events. The content and format for that paper:

  • India – PRC security competition, border dispute and regional relationships

POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Instructions:

Prepare regional challenges presentation (15 minute presentation) with accompanying information papers from the perspective of J-5 Strategy, Plans, and Policy desk officers on the USINDOPACOM staff focused on current or potential regional challenges or issues. Slides must include the NOTES (briefer’s comments/speach of what to say for each slide) filled in at the bottom of each slide. Students will present from the view of the country they are assigned to– India. As if student works for a high ranking officer in the Indian Army. Example, the India student would look at the issue from the Tokyo point of view might react. student will propose USINDOPACOM actions to further US interests related to the regional challenge and issue. The list of issues is not exhaustive and students may propose other areas of concern and issues such as current events. The content for presentation is:

  • India – PRC security competition, border dispute and regional relationships
  • Special educators must be able to effectively plan for students at all ages and abilities, using data and anecdotal information. An effective plan takes into consideration a student’s developmental level, age, strengths, needs, learning preferences, culture, and interests. Interventions that are well planned for students and are based on these factors are far more effective than interventions that narrowly focus only on the student’s academic skill deficiencies.

    In this assignment, practice developing ELA instruction that is appropriate for the students described in the “Class Profile” by designing a comprehensive ELA unit plan using the “5-Day Unit Plan Template.”

    Part 1: Unit Plan

    Develop a 5-day unit plan that integrates vocabulary, reading, grammar, writing, listening and speaking, and technology, for the “Class Profile” students, choosing either the resource or self-contained learning environment. In a typical resource or self-contained learning environment the teacher would differentiate for every student. For this assignment, choose three students for whom you will differentiate the instruction. Align your unit to a 6-12 grade level ELA standard from the Arizona or another state academic content standards.

    Design the unit plan to include:

    • National/State Learning Standards: Select standards that address reading, writing, speaking, and listening integration skills.
    • Multiple Means of Representation: Select strategies that allow opportunities to develop oral and written language for students with disabilities. Incorporate individual abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the section.
    • Multiple Means of Engagement: Select strategies to enhance language development and communication skills.
    • Multiple Means of Expression: Use technically sound formal and informal assessment.
    • Extension Activity and/or Homework: Incorporate activities that include critical thinking and problem-solving.
    • In the Differentiation rows of the unit plan template focus on the three students you selected.

    Part 2: Rationale

    In 250-500 words rationale at the bottom of your unit plan, explain the following:

    • How literacy skills from your lesson plan will be helpful for students in other content areas.
    • How communication and language arts strategies prepare students and provide them strategies to be successful academically and personally across multiple settings with a variety of collaborators (e.g., individuals, families, and teams).

    Support your findings with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

    While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

    College of Education (COE) program competencies and national standards assessed in the benchmark assignment:

    COE 4.1:

    Select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias. [CEC 4.1, ICSI.4.K1, ICSI.4.K2, ICSI.4.K4. ICSI.4.S1, ICSI.4.S5, ICSI.4.S8, IGC.4.K1, IGC.4.S1, IGC.4.S2, IGC.4.S3, IGC.4.S4, IGC.5.S13; InTASC 6(a), 6(b), 6(h), 6(j), 6(k); GCU Mission Critical 2, 3, 5]

    COE 5.1:

    Consider individual abilities, interests, learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the selection, development, and adaptation of learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.1, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S15, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 1(b), 2(d), 5(f), 6(v), 8(s), 9(h); GCU Mission Critical 2, 3, 4, 5]

    COE 5.4:

    Use strategies to enhance language development and communication skills of individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.4, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.S13, IGC.5.S14, IGC.5.S16, IGC.5.S17, IGC.5.S18, IGC.5.S19, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 2(e); GCU Mission Critical 1, 4]

    COE 5.5:

    Develop and implement a variety of education and transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and different learning experiences in collaboration with individuals, families, and teams. [CEC 5.5, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S8, ICSI.5.S15ICSI.5.S17, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.K3, IGC.5.K8, IGC.5.S1, IGC.5.S2, IGC.5.S11 IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 7(b), 7(e); GCU Mission Critical 1, 2, 4, 5]

    COE 5.7:

    Teach cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills such as critical thinking and problem solving to individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 5.7, ICSI.5.S14, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S16, IGC.5.S3, IGC.5.S10; InTASC 5(a), 7(h); GCU Mission Critical 1, 2, 4]

    Case Studies on The Benefits of Business Intelligence And Analytics

    open to the link for a reference https://www.datapine.com/blog/benefits-of-business

    I want you to reflect on the contents of the reading assignment for this week and submit what you make of that reading in two pages of word documents with further research and references.

    Your research paper should be at least 2 pages (800 words), double-spaced, have at least 4 APA references, and typed in an easy-to-read font in MS Word (other word processors are fine to use but save it in MS Word format)