For the creative genius who is an expert in business and knows all about stakeholders. This is a final class-I would love to work with one person the entire semester-if possible. I will be having several weekly assignments.

Using the organization in my upload please complete the following activities (worksheets) listed below that are part of the “Initiate SP Process” or “Set Up for Success, Step 1 (in my text).

Please note, I am not being asked to give my “blue-sky” ideas to the questions.

I MUST DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

I am required to support the answers given in the worksheets by indicating what research was conducted, materials used or discussions I had, that shaped my responses.

My interviewee(s) may remain anonymous, (CREATE FICTITIOUS PEOPLE) )but a description of the position and role of each interviewee must be given. In addition to the textbook, the course materials including the articles, videos, illustrations, assessment instruments, and presentations (when available) can be used as “research” to support your answers.

Please complete the following Worksheets in provided in the upload below:

PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING WORKSHEETS THOROUGHLY AND PROFESSIONALLY

  • Worksheet 1.1 – SP Process Issues and Outcomes
  • Worksheet 1.2 – Assessment of Conditions Needed for Success
  • Worksheet 1.3 – Data Requirements and Procedures (ID Stakeholders & Reasons) Note: See the GUIDANCE below.

One of the biggest complaints among managers is the huge amount of time they have to spend in meetings. Ideally the purpose of meetings is to put everyone’s heads together to solve a problem or make a decision. But far too often they can lead to unproductive, time-wasting conversations and even conflict.

For this assignment, think about some recent meetings you’ve attended where a significant decision had to be made. Think carefully about how some of the problems regarding group decision making that were discussed in the background readings apply to what you’ve experienced. Then write a 2- to 3-page paper addressing the following issues:

  1. Are all voices equally heard, or are some people afraid to speak up? Are participants in the meeting afraid to contradict senior management?
  2. Is time spent at the meetings productive, or is a lot of time wasted?
  3. Are the decisions that are made solid ones? Or do they suffer from problems mentioned in the background materials such as groupthink?
  4. Are ideas expressed at meetings creative and original, or are original ideas discouraged?
  5. Based on what you’ve described in Questions 1–4 above, what kind of group decision-making process would you recommend be used in meetings you attend? Base your answer on readings from the background materials such as Sims (2002).

Take one (gender, age, race, sexuality, disability, or weight) of the Implicit Association Tests (IAT) at the Harvard University website.
In 750-1,000 words, address the following:

  1. Examine how attitude is formed.
  2. Discuss how personal implicit biases can form understandings at a local, national or global level.
  3. Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the IAT as a research tool.
  4. Reflect on your personal results from the IAT.

Use three to five scholarly sources to support your thinking, your textbook can be used as one of the resources.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin. Avoid plagiarism.

Differentiated Instruction

In order to gain the perspective of stakeholders impacted by assessments in your organization, your job is to interview one of those stakeholders.

differenciated instruction.

Interview a learner or colleague of your choice and ask questions pertaining to assessments he or she has experienced in your organization.

Compose a variety of questions to ask during the interview. If you are a teacher, your subject will likely be one of your former students, a member of your family or children of a close friend from whom you can seek permission quickly. If you are focused on your workplace, you may select to ask someone that may no longer be directly impacted by their responses to your inquiry.

In all cases, use pseudonyms, absent of real names, to protect stakeholders as you discuss.

You may need to probe further than the required questions, but be discreet and professional.
Include the following questions:

  1. What is a test?
  2. How is a test different than an assessment or evaluation?
  3. Do you like taking tests – why or why not?
  4. What kind of tests are you usually given?
  5. When does a facilitator give tests?
  6. What is your favorite type of test?
  7. If you were given a choice, what kind of a test would you give? Explain why.

Omitting the stakeholder’s name, post a four- to five-paragraph summary about the results of your interview that includes:

  • The topic of assessment.
  • A brief description about your stakeholder – age, gender, and other information that would help create a picture of this person.
  • A summary of the interview and questions you used.
  • A conclusion that includes your critical reflection.

Required studies

Support your reasoning with evidence from the Required Studies and your research.

Click here for information on course rubrics.

Answer the Topic quiz questions with full detail. If you have any questions, let me know.

Chapter 1 provided a high-level overview of the need for a national framework for protecting critical infrastructure. For some additional reading, take a look at the latest Presidential Order that relates to strengthening cybersecurity that relates to critical infrastructure:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-strengthening-cybersecurity-federal-networks-critical-infrastructure/

After reading chapter 1 and looking at the link above, you’re ready to participate in the first discussion.

Let’s look at a real-world scenario and how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plays into it. In the scenario, the United States will be hit by a large-scale, coordinated cyber attack organized by China. These attacks debilitate the functioning of government agencies, parts of the critical infrastructure, and commercial ventures. The IT infrastructure of several agencies are paralyzed, the electric grid in most of the country is shut down, telephone traffic is seriously limited and satellite communications are down (limiting the Department of Defense’s [DOD’s] ability to communicate with commands overseas). International commerce and financial institutions are also severely hit. Please explain how DHS should handle this situation.

You must do the following:

1) Create a new thread. As indicated above, please explain how DHS should handle the situation described in the preceding paragraph.

2) Select AT LEAST 3 other students’ threads and post substantive comments on those threads. Your comments should extend the conversation started with the thread.

ALL original posts and comments must be substantive. (I’m looking for about a paragraph – not just “I agree.”)

How would the DHS assist commercial entities? How would DHS assist government agencies? Moreover, how would DHS assist commercial and government entities if telephone traffic is severely limited and satellite communication is down?

For this assignment, I need the updates made to the webpage. The work that has been done so far is attached. Also, as per the directions, I need the information added to the attached word document. Both the word doc and the website are everything that has been done in Unit 1 through Unit 4. This assignment is adding on to the existing work.

The file attached labeled ITSD325_Unit5_assignmentdetails. is the directions for this assignment.

Group DiscussionInitial Response due by Friday, 11:59pm
Response to TWO Classmates by Sunday, 11:59pm

By now you have read Gladwell, Stone, and your secondary print source. For this week’s class discussion, please answer the following questions about the secondary source you chose to read this week. Responses to questions should be at least 100-150 words each.

  1. What source did you chose? Who wrote it? Where is it from? Why did you choose it?
  2. What is the author’s main argument?
  3. What are at least three examples from the text that prove the argument?
  4. What new information have you learned from this piece that add to your understanding of the topic, Gladwell, and/or Stone?
  5. What piece of information in the article interested you the most or what was your AHA moment reading the article? Why?

Remember in your answers to be as specific as possible.

All the best,

Kelly

I attached a doc with the instructions of the discussion

Maximum of 600 words

COMPETENCIES


740.1.4Professional Accountability

The graduate analyzes the responsibilities and accountability of the professional nurse.

740.1.5Self Advocacy of the Nurse

The graduate integrates strategies of self-awareness and self-care into professional practice to ensure personal health and well¬being.

740.1.7Roles of the Nurse

The graduate analyzes the roles of the nurse as a scientist, a detective, and a manager of the healing environment.

740.1.10The Nursing Profession

The graduate applies historical and contemporary nursing theories and models to define their professional nursing practice.

740.1.13The Professional Nurse

The graduate integrates knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the nursing profession into personal and professional interactions and ethical decision making.

740.1.15Healthcare Work Environment

The graduate evaluates how the vision, values, mission, and philosophy of an organization align with an individual’s professional values, beliefs, and approaches to inter-professional collegiality.

INTRODUCTION


The purpose of this task is to develop a working knowledge of nursing theory, nursing ethics, and professional accountability and apply these concepts to your professional clinical practice. You will be required to think about real-life scenarios and how they relate to nursing codes in your professional practice.

REQUIREMENTS


Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

A. Identify a nursing theory that has influenced your values and goals.

1. Explain how nurses apply the identified theory from part A to implement excellent nursing practices.

2. Discuss how the identified theory from part A fits your professional practice.

B. Identify the contributions of two historical nursing figures in the nineteenth or twentieth century.

1. Compare the differences in contributions of the two historical figures identified in part B.

2. Describe how the contributions of the two historical figures influence your professional nursing practice.

C. Explain the functional differences between the State Board of Nursing and the American Nurses Association (ANA).

1. Define the roles of these two organizations.

2. Explain how these two organizations influence your nursing practice.

3. Explain the requirements for professional license renewal in your state.

a. Discuss the consequences of failure to maintain license requirements in your state.

4. Compare the differences between registered nursing license requirements in a compact state versus a non-compact state.

D. Discuss the functional differences between the Food and Drug Administration and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (see the web links below).

1. Discuss how the two regulatory agencies influence your professional nursing practice.

a. Describe your role as a patient advocate in promoting safety when a patient has requested to use an alternative therapy.

E. Discuss the purposes of the Nurse Practice Act in your state and its impact on your professional practice.

1. Discuss the scope of practice for a RN in your state.

2. Discuss how your state defines delegation for the RN.

F. Apply each of the following roles to your professional practice:

• a scientist

• a detective

• a manager of the healing environment

G. Identify two provisions from the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics (see web link below).

1. Analyze how the two provisions identified in part G influence your professional nursing practice.

2. Describe a nursing error that may occur in a clinical practice (e.g., clinical setting, skills lab, or simulation).

a. Explain how the ANA provisions identified in part G can be applied to the error discussed in part G2.

H. Identify four leadership qualities or traits that represent excellence in nursing.

1. Discuss the significance of the four leadership qualities identified in part H in the nurse’s role as each of the following:

• a leader at the bedside

• within a nursing team or interdisciplinary team

2. Identify how your work environment impacts the following:

• nursing leadership

• decision making

• professional development

I. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

J. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

RUBRIC



A
:
NURSING THEORY

NOT EVIDENT

A nursing theory that has influenced the candidate’s values and goals is not identified.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The nursing theory is identified, but it is not relevant to the candidate’s values and goals.

COMPETENT

A nursing theory that has influenced the candidate’s values and goals is identified.

A1: EXCELLENT NURSING PRACTICES

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how nurses apply the selected theory in part A to plan excellent nursing practices is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of how nurses apply the selected theory in part A to plan excellent nursing practices is illogical.

COMPETENT

The explanation of how nurses apply the selected theory in part A to plan excellent nursing practices is logical.

A2: PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE NURSING THEORY

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the theory from part A fits the candidate’s professional practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of how the theory from part A fits the candidate’s professional practice is irrelevant, or it inaccurately addresses the identified theory.

COMPETENT

The discussion of how the theory from part A fits the candidate’s professional practice is relevant, and it accurately addresses the identified theory.

B: CONTRIBUTIONS OF 19TH OR 20TH CENTURY HISTORICAL NURSING FIGURES

NOT EVIDENT

An identification of the contributions of 2 historical nursing figures in the nineteenth or twentieth century is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Not applicable.

COMPETENT

The contributions of 2 historical nursing figures in the nineteenth or twentieth century is identified.

B1: DIFFERENCES IN CONTRIBUTIONS

NOT EVIDENT

A comparison of the differences in contributions of the two historical figures discussed in part B is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The comparison inaccurately addresses the differences in the contributions of the 2 historical figures identified in part B, or the comparison is illogical or not supported.

COMPETENT

The comparison accurately addresses the differences in the contributions of the 2 historical figures identified in part B and is logical and well supported.

B2: DESCRIPTION OF HISTORICAL FIGURES

NOT EVIDENT

A description of how the contributions of 2 historical nursing figures have influenced the candidate’s nursing practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description of how the contributions of 2 historical nursing figures have influenced the candidate’s nursing practice is inaccurate.

COMPETENT

The description of how the contributions of the 2 historical nursing figures have influenced the candidate’s nursing practice is accurate.

C: STATE BOARD OF NURSING VERSUS ANA

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of the functional differences between the State Board of Nursing and the American Nurses Association (ANA) is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of the functional differences between the State Board of Nursing and the ANA is inaccurate or not supported.

COMPETENT

The explanation of the functional differences between the State Board of Nursing and the ANA is accurate and well supported.

C1: ROLES OF ORGANIZATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

A definition of the roles of the State Board of Nursing and the ANA is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The definition of the role of the State Board of Nursing and the role of the ANA is provided, but it contains inaccuracies, or it is not supported by verifiable facts.

COMPETENT

The definition of the roles of the State Board of Nursing and the ANA is provided and supported.

C2: INFLUENCE OF THE STATE BOARD OF NURSING AND ANA

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the State Board of Nursing and the ANA influence the candidate’s nursing practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of how the State Board of Nursing and the ANA influence the candidate’s nursing practice is inaccurate or irrelevant.

COMPETENT

The explanation of how the State Board of Nursing and the ANA influence the candidate’s nursing practice is accurate and relevant.

C3: REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL LICENSE RENEWAL

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of the requirements for professional license renewal in the candidate’s state is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of the requirements for professional license renewal in the candidate’s state is inaccurate or not supported.

COMPETENT

The explanation of the requirements for professional license renewal in the candidate’s state is accurate and well supported.

C3A: FAILURE TO MAINTAIN LICENSE REQUIREMENTS

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the consequences of failure to maintain license requirements in the candidate’s state is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the consequences of failure to maintain license requirements in the candidate’s state is inaccurate.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the consequences of failure to maintain license in the candidate’s state is accurate.

C4: COMPACT VERSUS NON-COMPACT STATE

NOT EVIDENT

A comparison of the differences between registered nursing license requirements in a compact state versus a non-compact state is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The comparison inaccurately addresses the differences between registered nursing license requirements in a compact state versus a non-compact state, or it is not supported.

COMPETENT

The comparison accurately addresses the differences between registered nursing license requirements in a compact state versus a non-compact state and is well supported.

D: AGENCIES FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the functional differences between the given regulatory agencies is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the functional differences between the given agencies is inaccurate or not supported.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the functional differences between the given agencies is accurate and well supported.

D1: INFLUENCE ON PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the regulatory agencies influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of how the regulatory agencies influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice is irrelevant.

COMPETENT

The discussion of how the regulatory agencies influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice is relevant.

D1A: NURSE’S ROLE AS A PATIENT ADVOCATE

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the candidate’s role as a patient advocate in promoting safety when the patient has selected an alternative treatment is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the candidate’s role as a patient advocate in promoting safety when the patient has selected an alternative treatment is not relevant.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the candidate’s role as a patient advocate in promoting safety when the patient has selected an alternative treatment is relevant.

E: PURPOSES OF THE NURSE PRACTICE ACT

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the purposes of the Nurse Practice Act and its influence on the candidate’s professional practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the purposes of the Nurse Practice Act and its influence on the candidate’s professional practice is inaccurate, or it is not supported.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the purposes of the Nurse Practice Act and its influence on the candidate’s professional practice is accurate and well supported.

E1: SCOPE OF PRACTICE

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the scope of practice for an RN in the candidate’s state is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the scope of practice for an RN in the candidate’s state is illogical or unsupported.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the scope of practice for an RN in the candidate’s state is logical and well supported.

E2: RULES FOR EFFECTIVE DELEGATION

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the candidate’s state defines delegation for the RN is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

A discussion of how the candidate’s state defines delegation for the RN is illogical or not supported.

COMPETENT

The discussion of how the candidate’s state defines delegation for the RN is logical and well supported.

F: APPLICATION OF NURSING ROLES

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of the application of each nursing role to the candidate’s professional practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The discussion of the application of each nursing role to the candidate’s professional practice is irrelevant.

COMPETENT

The discussion of the application of each nursing role to the candidate’s professional practice is relevant.

G: ANA CODE OF ETHICS PROVISIONS

NOT EVIDENT

2 provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics are not identified.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

2 provisions from the ANA Code of Ethics are identified, but they are inaccurate.

COMPETENT

2 provisions from the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics are accurately identified.

G1: ANALYSIS OF PROVISIONS

NOT EVIDENT

An analysis of how the 2 provisions identified in part G influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The analysis inaccurately addresses how the 2 provisions identified in part G influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice, or the analysis is not reasoned.

COMPETENT

The analysis accurately addresses how the 2 provisions identified in part G influence the candidate’s professional nursing practice and the analysis is reasoned.

G2: CLINICAL PRACTICE ERROR

NOT EVIDENT

A description of a nursing error in a clinical practice example is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The description of a nursing error in a clinical practice example is irrelevant.

COMPETENT

The description of a nursing error in a clinical practice example is relevant.

G2A: APPLICATION OF ANA PROVISIONS

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how ANA provisions in part G can be applied to the error from part G2 is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation of how the ANA provisions in part G can be applied to the error from part G2 is irrelevant.

COMPETENT

The explanation of how the ANA provisions in part G can be applied to the error from part G2 is relevant.

H: LEADERSHIP QUALITIES OR TRAITS

NOT EVIDENT

4 leadership qualities or traits are not identified.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

4 leadership qualities or traits are identified, but they do not represent excellence in nursing, or they are otherwise inappropriate for a nursing practice.

COMPETENT

4 leadership qualities or traits that represent excellence in nursing are identified, and are appropriate for a nursing practice.

H1: DEMONSTRATION OF NURSING LEADERSHIP QUALITIES OR TRAITS

NOT EVIDENT

A discussion of how the nurse uses the identified leadership qualities or traits in part H in each of the given roles is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Email: support@assignmentcollections.com - Phone: +1 (571) 600-4926 - © Copyright - Assignment Collections