2024 Elasticities & Market Structure Assignment Help

The board of directors at AutoEdge is actively discussing several options to address 2023

The board of directors at AutoEdge is actively discussing several options to address flagging revenue. One option continues to surface during each board meeting; that is, relocating the manufacturing operation back to the United States. Longtime Chief Financial Officer, Ingrid Adams, leads the group that is in favor of this option. Ingrid Adams approaches you in the company break room. “Hello,” she says. “I’m glad I saw you.””Hi,” you say. “What can I do for you?””I have a question about economics,” she says. “I think you can help me explain something to some shareholders on the board.” “Economics! My favorite subject,” you say. “What’s your question?””If AutoEdge decided to increase its prices and return to the United States,” she says, “how would this action affect consumer demand? I want to know your opinion about elasticity.””Sure,” you say. “So you want to know if the elasticity for auto parts is considered to be relatively inelastic, relatively elastic, unitary elastic, perfectly elastic, or perfectly inelastic. Right?””Exactly,” she says.”I have an opinion,” you say. “Do you want to talk about it now, or do you want something in writing?””Something in writing would be best,” she says. “Would you explain your opinion so that I can respond to questions from other members of the board, too?” “I’d be glad to,” you say. “I’ll put something together this afternoon and get it to you before I leave today. Is that soon enough?””Perfect,” she says. “Thanks for your help.”

2024 21st Century Leadership Assignment Help

Assignment 2 Case Study Michael Dell The Man Behind Dell PowerPoint Presentation Change Management Michael Dell began building and selling 2023

Assignment 2: Case Study: Michael Dell—The Man Behind Dell, PowerPoint Presentation (Change Management) Michael Dell began building and selling computers from his dorm room at age 19. He dropped out of the University of Texas when his sales hit $60 million and has never looked back. Dell is said to be the fifteenth richest man in America, and the youngest CEO to make the Fortune 500. Intensely private and notoriously shy, Dell is hailed as a corporate wonder-kid. He climbed to the top by exploiting tax loopholes, outsourcing the competition, and inventing a term called “leveraged recapitalization.” First, review the following case study: Michael Dell- You Won’t Have Michael Dell To Kick Around Anymore Then, in a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, address the following tasks: Analyze Dell’s philosophy as it relates to the role of change in organizational success. Determine how Dell’s philosophy would be perceived in a low performing culture. Identify which performing culture best suits your philosophy regarding change management and provide your rationale. Consider the way Dell started his company; determine what market conditions made the business possible. Discuss Dell’s approach to building his brand. Use the speaker notes feature of MS PowerPoint to provide the essential details. Use at least two scholarly sources (in addition to your textbook) to complete your research. Cite your sources using in-text citations with full references on a References slide at the end. Apply APA standards to the citation of sources. Save your presentation as LastnameFirstInitial_M2_A2.ppt. Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. By the due date assigned , deliver your assignment to the Submissions Area . Guglielmo, C. (2013). You Won’t Have Michael Dell To Kick Around Anymore. Forbes Asia , 9 (14), 74-80. http://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?sch=auo&turl=http://search.ebscohost.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=94269277&site=eds-live

2024 ASSIGNMENT 1 – TITLE: Strategic Analysis Assignment Help

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SIM336 ASSIGNMENT 1 TITLE Strategic Analysis Issue Date Due Date Learning outcomes 2023

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT SIM336 ASSIGNMENT 1 – TITLE: Strategic Analysis Issue Date: Due Date: Learning outcomes: Strategic analysis of an organization(s). Synthesis of ideas or solutions relating to strategy issues Skills outcomes: Research skills Critical evaluation Creativity Communication Moderated by: John Dixon-Dawson All work submitted must adhere to the University Policy on ‘Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism’ You must not submit an assignment that analyses the mobile phone industry and or a mobile phone company. Task: You are required to submit an individual report of 3,000 ±10% words, which can be based on an organization or idea of your own choice. The strategic analysis must be related to a recognised aspect of business policy, strategic management or the philosophical underpinning of a particular methodology within the public or private sector strategic management domain. If your analysis is of an organisation then do not submit a functional analysis; for example do not submit a strategic marketing analysis or a strategic human resource analysis. You should be applying the concepts and models from the topics that are within the module to your chosen organisation. The report must be written in a recognised style, i.e. table of contents, introduction, main analysis, conclusions, recommendations, references and bibliography. You must apply the Harvard system of referencing in your report. Objectives To analyse a business policy or strategic management topic, to carry out individual research or evaluation of an organization. Requirements Meet the learning outcomes listed above, identify and critically analyse fundamental issues related to strategic management. Undertake a study that shows clear evidence of synthesis and evaluation. There are a number of ways you might carry out this assignment: here are a few ideas: Use a theoretical model to reflect upon the reality (practice) of a situation. Use theory to predict the outcomes of practice. Use practice to reflect upon / modify theory; Compare theory and practice: Does M.E. Porter’s (1985) model of competition support the experience of practitioners? i.e. use a practical example /case / issue to reflect on Porter’s model(s) and examine success and / or failure. A case study approach: Is the C.E.O. managing Microsoft as effectively as he might? i.e. do an analysis of Microsoft’s performance in relation to declared (or undeclared) strategy and the efficacy of his strategy. A recovery plan: My advice to the Chief Executive Officer of the Sony Corporation is ……i.e. suggest a way forward for the organization in light of their poor performance over the last 5 years. A risk management strategy: My advice to British Petroleum’s Chief Executive Officer in light of their environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. These are merely examples of approaches you might take; thinking up your own ideas might be more productive and fun. Assessment Criteria Your seminar tutor on the basis of the following general criteria will assess the paper: Content – the quality of research and analysis undertaken and the use of initiative in finding sources of information; Process – the quality and clarity of the assignment and your ability to demonstrate command over the subject area and the development of a case or argument; Discretion – additional credit may be awarded to a student who tackles a difficult subject well. The assignment will be graded for individuals on the basis of the specific criteria outlined on the following page. The “Presentation” element of the Generic Assessment Criteria will be used to assess the report structure. Generic Assessment Criteria – Undergraduate These should be interpreted according to the level at which you are working and related to the assessment criteria for the module Categories Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis Argument and Structure Critical Evaluation Presentation Reference to Literature Pass 86 – 100% The work examined is exemplary and provides clear evidence of a complete grasp of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also ample excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be exemplary in all the categories cited above. It will demonstrate a particularly compelling evaluation, originality, and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse. 76-85% The work examined is outstanding and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work will be outstanding in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse. 70 – 75% The work examined is excellent and is evidence of comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. There is also excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that level are satisfied At this level it is expected that the work will be excellent in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse. 60 – 69% Directly relevant to the requirements of the assessment A substantial knowledge of strategy material, showing a clear grasp of themes, questions and issues therein A good strategic analysis, clear and orderly Generally coherent and logically structured, using an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical mode(s) May contain some distinctive or independent thinking; may begin to formulate an independent position in relation to strategic theory and/or practice. Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style with acceptable format Critical appraisal of up-todate and/or appropriate literature. Recognition of different perspectives. Very good use of source material. Uses a range of sources 50 – 59% Some attempt to address the requirements of the assessment: may drift away from this in less focused passages Adequate knowledge of a fair range of relevant strategy material, with intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance Some analytical treatment, but may be prone to description, or to narrative, which lacks clear analytical purpose Some attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency, with issues at stake stated only vaguely, or theoretical mode(s) couched in simplistic terms Sound work which expresses a coherent position only in broad terms and in uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of strategy. Competently written, with only minor lapses from standard grammar, with acceptable format Uses a variety of literature which includes some recent strategic texts and/or appropriate literature, though not necessarily including a substantive amount beyond library texts. Competent use of source material. 40 – 49% Some correlation with the requirements of the assessment but there are instances of irrelevance Basic understanding of the strategy but addressing a limited range of material Largely descriptive or narrative, with little evidence of analysis A basic argument is evident, but mainly supported by assertion and there may be a lack of clarity and coherence Some evidence of a view starting to be formed but mainly derivative. A simple basic style but with significant deficiencies in expression or format that may pose obstacles for the reader Some up-to-date and/or appropriate literature used. Goes beyond the material tutor has provided. Limited use of sources to support a point. Fail 35 – 39% Relevance to the requirements of the assessment may be very intermittent, and may be reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms A limited understanding of a narrow range of strategic material. Heavy dependence on description, and/or on paraphrase, is common Little evidence of coherent argument: lacks development and may be repetitive or thin Almost wholly derivative: the writer’s contribution rarely goes beyond simplifying paraphrase Numerous deficiencies in expression and presentation; the writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using a simplistic or repetitious style Barely adequate use of literature. Over reliance on material provided by the tutor. The evidence provided shows that the majority of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied – for compensation consideration. 30 – 34% The work examined provides insufficient evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence provided shows that some of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in some of the indicators. 15-29% The work examined is unacceptable and provides little evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence shows that few of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in several of the indicators. 0-14% The work examined is unacceptable and provides almost no evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to the Level of the qualification. The evidence fails to show that any of the learning outcomes and responsibilities appropriate to that Level are satisfied. The work will be weak in the majority or all of the indicators.

2024 BU330 Accounting for Managers Directions: Be sure to make an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Assignment Help

Assignment 04 BU330 Accounting for Managers Directions Be sure to make an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to 2023

Assignment 04 BU330 Accounting for Managers Directions: Be sure to make an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Factoring resource constraints into product mix decisions Rose Incorporated manufactures two types of vases, small and large. The following per-unit data are available. Small Vase Large Vase Sale price $60 $100 Variable costs $35 $60 Machine hours required for 1 vase 1 2 Total fixed costs are $600,000, and Rose Incorporated can sell a maximum of 25,000 units of each type of vase annually. Machine hour capacity is 50,000 hours per year. a. Determine the contribution margin per unit for each type of vase. b. Determine the contribution margin per machine hour for each type of vase. c. Determine the number of units of each style of vase that Rose Incorporated should produce to maximize operating income. d. What is the dollar amount of the maximum operating income as calculated in C above?